Code Intelligence Hub

General 6 min

Rachel Foster · 2 months ago

Automating Code Plagiarism Detection in GitHub Actions With Codequiry

Set up an automated code plagiarism detection pipeline in GitHub Actions using Codequiry's REST API. Follow precise steps to write a workflow YAML and a Python script that submits student code, receives similarity scores, flags suspicious pushes, and optionally detects AI-generated code. Includes threshold tuning, result interpretation, and false positive handling.

Read →

General 12 min

Priya Sharma · 2 months ago

Similarity Score Distributions Across Four Intro CS Languages

A three-semester analysis of 4,100 CS1 submissions shows why a 70% similarity score means different things in Python, Java, C++, and JavaScript. I break down percentile thresholds, boilerplate effects, false positives, and how to pair similarity checks with AI detection.

Read →

General 10 min

Priya Sharma · 2 months ago

Detecting Stack Overflow Code in Student Java Submissions

Most plagiarism checkers only compare submissions against each other, so a Stack Overflow snippet with renamed variables sails through. We break down how web source matching uses token and AST fingerprints to catch code copied from Stack Overflow, GitHub, and tutorials, and show a Java example where refactoring did not hide the source.

Read →

General 4 min

Marcus Rodriguez · 2 months ago

What 14,000 Python Submissions Reveal About AI Detection Errors

A three-semester case study at Briarwood University tracked 14,000 Python assignments through four AI code detectors. The result: false positive rates from 4% to 9% overall, spiking to 23% on common algorithmic patterns. This article breaks down the data, the code patterns that trigger false flags, and a practical workflow for balancing detection with fairness.

Read →

General 8 min

Marcus Rodriguez · 2 months ago

Grading Assignments to Detect AI-Generated Code in Student Submissions

Most AI-generated code in student submissions goes unnoticed when instructors rely on intuition or a single detector. This research-style guide explains how to layer statistical signals, peer similarity, web-source checks, and rubric design to reliably catch AI-assisted code without manufacturing false positives.

Read →

General 8 min

James Okafor · 2 months ago

ChatGPT vs Copilot vs Gemini Code Detection Benchmarked

A head-to-head evaluation of AI code detection across ChatGPT-4o, GitHub Copilot, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro. One pattern kept surfacing: text-only detectors miss refactored LLM code, while structural and multi-signal checks hold up.

Read →

General 7 min

Rachel Foster · 2 months ago

A Hiring Manager's Audit of AI-Generated Code in Take-Home Tests

An engineering leader audit of 1,284 remote take-home coding submissions found 31.2% flagged as likely AI-generated at high confidence. Manual review confirmed 279 of 401 high-confidence flags, with a 4.5% false positive rate among high-confidence flags. Here is what the data showed and how hiring managers should handle AI detection scores.

Read →

General 11 min

Dr. Sarah Chen · 2 months ago

What Happens When a CS Course Runs Both MOSS and ChatGPT Detectors

Over 1,200 student submissions from a large public university’s introductory Python course were analyzed with Codequiry’s similarity engine and its AI code detector. The results show how traditional plagiarism tools miss a growing fraction of unauthorized work—and why layering AI detection changes what instructors actually see.

Read →

General 11 min

Alex Petrov · 3 months ago

How a University Caught AI-Generated Code in 14Percent of CS2 Submissions

When Riverside University’s CS department ran an AI detector across 300 CS2 assignments alongside MOSS, they discovered a new layer of academic integrity challenges. The case study reveals what they found, how they calibrated thresholds, and why combining AI detection with source-code fingerprinting changed their grading workflow.

Read →

General 11 min

James Okafor · 3 months ago

Token Fingerprinting vs AST Matching on 1,000 Refactored Java Programs

When students rename variables, extract methods, and reorder statements to hide copied code, which detection algorithm actually holds up? A controlled experiment pits winnowing, token-based matching, and AST structural hashing against a ladder of refactoring transformations — and reveals why single-technique checkers miss the cases that academic-integrity panels care about most.

Read →

General 11 min

Marcus Rodriguez · 3 months ago

At What Point Does Token-Based Detection Fail Against Automated Refactoring?

Most plagiarism detectors rely on token streams, which break down as soon as students rename variables, reorder statements, or extract methods. We map the precise failure points, walk through AST-based recovery techniques, and show how fingerprinting fills the gaps that tree comparators leave behind. A must-bookmark deep‑dive for any CS educator or engineering lead who has watched suspect code sail right through a token‑only scanner.

Read →

General 11 min

Priya Sharma · 3 months ago

How Source Code Plagiarism Detection Escaped the Diff Trap

What started as a textual diff in Unix is now a high-stakes algorithmic arms race. This article traces the thirty-year evolution of source code plagiarism detection—from simple token matching and AST comparison to fingerprinting that survives variable renaming, and finally to the fresh challenge of AI-generated code. We examine the real detection rates, the tools that led each era, and where Codequiry fits as the first hybrid platform to unify peer, web, and AI checks in a single reporting workflow.

Read →